Template draft. Replace everything in [square brackets] with your own decision,
delete what does not describe what you really do, and approve it through your own document control. It is not legal
advice and does not make an organisation compliant or certified.
1. Purpose
This procedure gives the Organisation one route for dealing with anything that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of its information or services. It fixes who may declare an incident, how serious it is judged to be, who must act, how quickly, what must be told to customers, authorities and individuals, and how the lessons are fed back.
It supports the Information Security Incident Management Policy and is the operating document for the incident response team.
2. Scope
- In scope: every information security event, weakness and incident affecting the Organisation's information, systems, networks, premises, people or suppliers, including those occurring in cloud services and at suppliers on the Organisation's behalf.
- In scope: events involving customer data and personal data, and events at customers' environments that the Organisation operates or supports.
- Out of scope: general IT faults with no security aspect, which follow the Problem Management Policy and Process; if such a fault turns out to have a security cause, it enters this procedure at once.
- Applies to: all employees, contractors and third parties with access, and to the incident response team and its leaders.
3. Terms and definitions
| Term | Meaning |
|---|
| Information security event | An observed occurrence that may indicate a breach of policy or a failure of a control, not yet assessed. |
| Information security incident | One or more events that are assessed as having a real or likely harmful effect on information or services. |
| Weakness | A flaw or gap, such as an unpatched system or a misconfiguration, found before it is exploited. |
| Near miss | An event that was stopped or had no effect, reported so the cause can be removed. |
| Personal data breach | An incident in which personal data is accessed, disclosed, altered, lost or destroyed without authority. |
| Incident manager | The person who runs a particular incident from declaration to closure. |
| Containment | Action that stops an incident spreading or worsening without yet removing its cause. |
| Indicator of compromise | A technical trace such as an address, file hash or account name that shows an attack. |
| Chain of custody | The documented record of who held a piece of evidence and what was done with it. |
4. Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|
| Head of Information Security (procedure owner) | Owns the procedure, declares Severity 1 and 2 incidents, leads the incident response team and reports to management. |
| Incident manager | Appointed per incident; coordinates actions, keeps the timeline and the register entry, communicates with stakeholders, and closes the incident. |
| Security operations analysts | Monitor alerts, triage events, run initial investigation and contain threats. |
| IT and infrastructure engineers | Carry out containment, eradication and recovery on systems, networks and cloud services. |
| Application and product owners | Provide system knowledge, decide business trade-offs and support recovery of their services. |
| Data Protection Officer | Assesses personal data impact and advises on notification to the data protection authority and to individuals. |
| Legal counsel | Advises on regulatory notices, contracts, evidence handling, law enforcement contact and claims. |
| Communications lead | Prepares and approves internal and external statements. |
| Human resources | Support when staff conduct is involved, and for welfare of staff involved. |
| Senior management | Approves major decisions such as service shutdown, ransom positions, public statements, and reports to the board. |
| All staff | Report events immediately, preserve evidence, and follow instructions during an incident. |
5. Incident Management Governance and Team
5.1 Governance
- The Head of Information Security owns the process. Senior management reviews incident statistics, repeat causes and open actions at least every [quarter].
- An incident response team (IRT) exists as a standing group with named members and deputies. Its contact list is checked every [3 months] and held offline as well as online.
- A single incident has one incident manager. Authority to take systems offline is pre-agreed for Severity 1 and 2 incidents in the severity matrix.
- Roles are assigned so that someone who is part of the cause of an incident does not investigate it alone.
- An external forensic and response provider is retained under a contract that gives response within [4 hours], with confidentiality terms agreed in advance.
5.2 Incident response team structure
| IRT role | Typical member | Responsibility in an incident | Available |
|---|
| IRT lead | Head of Information Security | Declares, sets priorities, escalates to management | [24x7 on call] |
| Incident manager | Senior security analyst | Runs the incident day to day, keeps the log | [24x7 on rota] |
| Technical lead | Senior engineer for the affected area | Directs containment and recovery steps | [On call] |
| Forensics lead | Security analyst or external provider | Collects and protects evidence, analysis | [Within 4 hours] |
| Privacy lead | Data Protection Officer | Data impact, notification advice | [Within 2 hours] |
| Legal lead | Legal counsel | Regulatory and contractual notices, privilege | [Business hours; on call for Severity 1] |
| Communications lead | Head of Communications | Statements, customer messages | [On call for Severity 1 and 2] |
| Business liaison | Service owner | Business impact, customer calls | [On call] |
| Scribe | Analyst or administrator | Timeline and decisions log | [During incident] |
Deputies are named for each role. During an extended incident, shifts are planned so that no one works more than [12 hours] without rest, and handover notes are written at each change.
5.3 Contact with authorities and special interest groups
The Legal lead keeps up-to-date contacts for the national cyber authority, the data protection authority, law enforcement, sectoral regulators, insurers, and relevant information-sharing groups. Contact is made only through the Legal lead or the IRT lead, and each contact is recorded in the incident file.
6. Types of Events
| Event type | Examples | Typical first responder |
|---|
| Malware and ransomware | Encrypted files, malicious attachment executed, command-and-control traffic | Security operations |
| Phishing and social engineering | Credential harvesting, invoice fraud, impersonation of executives, voice fraud | Security operations |
| Unauthorised access | Account takeover, privilege misuse, access to systems or premises without approval | Security operations |
| Data loss or leakage | Misdirected email, public cloud storage, lost device, unauthorised download | Security operations and Data Protection Officer |
| Denial of service | Traffic floods, resource exhaustion, targeted application attacks | Network engineers |
| Web and application compromise | Injection, defacement, exposed credentials in code, API abuse | Application owner and security |
| Insider activity | Data theft by staff, sabotage, policy circumvention | Information security with HR |
| Third-party and supply chain | Compromise of a supplier, vulnerable component, malicious update | Vendor owner and security |
| Physical | Theft, tailgating, unauthorised entry, damage to equipment or facilities | Facilities and security |
| Vulnerability and misconfiguration | Critical flaw exploited or publicly known, exposed management interface | IT operations |
| Loss of availability | Outage with a suspected security cause, failed backups, destroyed data | IT operations |
| Policy breach | Use of unapproved services, sharing credentials, ignoring controls | Line manager and HR |
7. Incident Severity Matrix
7.1 Severity levels and targets
| Level | Description | Examples | Acknowledge | Contain target | Update frequency | Who is told |
|---|
| Severity 1: Critical | Major loss of data or service, active attack, personal data of many people, legal or regulatory notice likely | Ransomware on production, customer data exposure, compromise of administrator accounts | [15 minutes] | [4 hours] | [Every 1 hour] | Senior management, board chair, Legal, DPO, customers per contract |
| Severity 2: High | Significant impact on a service or sensitive data, contained to a limited set of systems or users | Single server compromise, targeted phishing success, serious vulnerability under exploit | [30 minutes] | [8 hours] | [Every 2 hours] | Head of Information Security, service owner, DPO |
| Severity 3: Medium | Limited impact, no sensitive data exposed, workaround available | Malware on one endpoint contained, brute-force attempts blocked, policy breach with limited effect | [2 hours] | [1 working day] | [Daily] | Security manager, line manager |
| Severity 4: Low | Minor event, no impact, near miss or weakness | Blocked phishing mail, lost device with encryption, failed login spike | [1 working day] | [5 working days] | [On closure] | Reporter, security analyst |
7.2 Factors used to set severity
- Sensitivity and volume of data affected, including whether personal data or customer data is involved.
- Number and criticality of systems and services affected, and effect on customers and their commitments.
- Whether the attack is ongoing, how far it has spread, and whether the attacker has privileged access.
- Legal, regulatory or contractual duty to notify, and likely reputation or financial loss.
- Ability to recover from backups, and time to restore.
Note. Severity is reviewed at every update. When in doubt, choose the higher level, and lower it only when facts support it. The incident manager records each change and the reason.
8. Preparing for Cybersecurity Incidents
8.1 Playbooks
A playbook gives a short, tested, step-by-step response for a common scenario, so that responders do not have to design the response under pressure. Each playbook states trigger, severity, roles, containment, eradication, recovery, evidence, communications, and exit criteria.
| Playbook | Key containment actions | Test frequency |
|---|
| Ransomware | Isolate hosts from the network, disable affected accounts and shares, protect backups, preserve a memory image, assess spread | [6 months] |
| Business email compromise | Reset credentials and sessions, remove forwarding rules, notify finance to halt payments, recall mail | [12 months] |
| Phishing campaign | Block sender and links, purge messages, reset exposed accounts, brief staff | [12 months] |
| Lost or stolen device | Remote lock or wipe, disable tokens, check data on the device, report to authorities if needed | [12 months] |
| Data leak or misdirected disclosure | Recall or revoke access, contact recipient, assess data, notify per procedure | [12 months] |
| Denial of service | Activate traffic scrubbing and rate limits, contact provider, scale capacity | [12 months] |
| Compromised privileged account | Disable account, rotate secrets, review actions, hunt for persistence | [6 months] |
| Supplier compromise | Suspend integrations, rotate shared credentials, request supplier evidence | [12 months] |
| Web application attack | Block malicious requests, take down vulnerable function, patch, review logs | [12 months] |
Playbooks are tested by a tabletop exercise at least [once a year] for the most serious scenarios, and the results lead to updates. They are held where responders can reach them even if systems are down.
8.2 Configuring devices and systems to support response
| Area | Preparation |
|---|
| Logging | Central collection from endpoints, servers, network devices, identity systems and cloud accounts under the Logging and Monitoring Procedure; time synchronised to one source |
| Endpoint protection | Detection and response agent on all endpoints and servers, with isolation function tested |
| Hardening | Secure baselines, unnecessary services off, default credentials removed, patching per the patch procedure |
| Backups | Offline or immutable copies, tested restores, documented recovery order |
| Access | Multi-factor authentication, break-glass accounts under control, privileged access monitored |
| Network | Segmentation, egress filtering, ability to isolate segments quickly |
| Forensic readiness | Disk and memory imaging tools, storage for evidence, write blockers, chain of custody forms |
| Communications | Out-of-band channel for the IRT in case email and chat are compromised; printed contact list |
| Cloud | Audit logging on in every account, alerts on privilege changes, snapshots of affected instances possible |
8.3 Training staff on incident response
- All staff learn in induction and each year how to recognise and report an event and what not to do (do not delete, do not investigate alone).
- IRT members complete role training when they join and attend an exercise at least [twice a year]; at least one exercise involves senior management.
- Service desk staff are trained to spot security signs in ordinary calls and to open a security ticket.
- Attendance and exercise results are recorded; findings are tracked to closure.
9. Detecting and Reporting Events and Weaknesses
9.1 Signs of an incident
| Source | Signs |
|---|
| Users and customers | Unexpected password reset emails, strange pop-ups, files that will not open, messages the user did not send, a request to pay or share data urgently, a customer reporting spam from the Organisation |
| Endpoints | Antivirus or detection alerts, new software or browser extensions, slow machine, disabled security tool, unknown scheduled tasks |
| Servers and applications | Unexpected restarts, unknown accounts or processes, changes to files or configuration, spike in errors or database queries, web shells |
| Network | Traffic to unknown destinations, large outbound transfers, port scans, unusual protocols, connections at odd hours |
| Identity | Logins from unusual places or impossible travel, repeated failures then success, new multi-factor devices, privilege changes |
| Cloud | New access keys, public storage, disabled logging, resources in unused regions |
| Data | Large exports, bulk queries, personal data seen in public places or on paste sites |
| Physical | Missing equipment, forced doors, unknown people in secure areas, tampered devices |
| External | Notices from a researcher, supplier, regulator or law enforcement, threat intelligence on leaked credentials |
9.2 Incident triggers
Any one of the following triggers moves an event into formal assessment under this procedure.
- An alert from a monitoring or detection tool that matches a rule rated High or Critical and cannot be explained as normal within [30 minutes].
- A report from any person, internal or external, that credentials, data, devices or systems may be compromised.
- A failed or bypassed control, such as a firewall rule open to the internet, a disabled endpoint agent, or a failed backup of critical data.
- Evidence of unauthorised change to configuration, code or data.
- Notification from a supplier, customer, researcher, authority or the media.
- A vulnerability rated Critical that is being exploited or for which an exploit is public, and which cannot be patched within [72 hours].
- Discovery of personal data in an unauthorised place or sent to the wrong party.
9.3 Reporting by personnel
- NoticeThe person who sees something unusual stops using the affected device or account only if safe, and does not delete files, restart or investigate alone.
- ReportReport at once, and in any case within [1 hour] of noticing, to the service desk by [phone, the security mailbox or the ticketing portal], with what was seen, when, and on which system.
- LogThe service desk opens an incident ticket and flags it Security within [15 minutes]. Anyone may report outside hours by the on-call number.
- TriageThe security analyst contacts the reporter within the time target of the provisional severity and records the first assessment.
- FeedbackThe reporter is told the outcome. Reporting in good faith is never penalised, and the reporter's identity is kept confidential on request.
Note. A weakness, near miss or policy breach is reported in the same way, so that it can be fixed before it becomes an incident.
9.4 Reporting a personal data breach
Any suspected exposure of personal data is reported as above, and the service desk adds the label Privacy so that the Data Protection Officer is alerted. The Data Protection Officer begins an assessment within [2 hours] of notice.
- Establish factsWhat data, how many people, what happened, since when, and whether it is still happening.
- Assess harmJudge likely harm to individuals: identity theft, financial loss, discrimination, distress, danger to safety. Children's data and sensitive data raise the risk.
- ContainStop further exposure: recall, revoke access, take down public content, change credentials.
- Decide on notificationThe Data Protection Officer, Legal and senior management decide whether to notify the data protection authority and the individuals, as the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and its Rules and any other applicable data protection law may require [confirm the current requirement]. Decision and reasons are recorded within [24 hours] of confirming a breach.
- NotifyNotices to the authority state the nature of the breach, likely consequences, measures taken and a contact point. Notices to individuals are in plain language and say what they should do. Where the Organisation acts as processor, the customer is told within the time in the contract.
- RecordEvery breach, including those not notified, is logged in the incident register with the reasoning.
9.5 Reporting to the national cyber authority
The Organisation reports qualifying cyber incidents to CERT-In within 6 hours of noticing them, as the CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 require [confirm the current requirement]. The Legal lead and the IRT lead check the current list of reportable incident types and the format before every report [confirm the current requirement].
- NoticeThe time of first noticing by any person is written in the register as the start of the reporting period, even if severity is not yet agreed.
- ClassifyWithin [2 hours] of noticing, the incident manager and Legal decide whether the incident is of a type that must be reported to CERT-In [confirm the current requirement]. When in doubt, report.
- PrepareFill the report with what is known: date and time, systems and services affected, nature of the incident, indicators, impact, actions taken and a contact. More detail follows later; an incomplete report is better than a late one.
- SubmitThe Legal lead or the IRT lead submits the report through the channel the authority specifies and records the reference and the time.
- Follow upProvide updates and information the authority asks for. Close with a final report.
- Keep logsICT system logs are kept for 180 days within Indian jurisdiction and provided on request, as the CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 require [confirm the current requirement].
Note. The Organisation also keeps a named point of contact for the authority, and the contact details are tested every [6 months].
9.6 Reporting to customers, regulators and other parties
| Party | When | Who sends | Content |
|---|
| Customers affected | As the contract requires, and no later than [24 hours] after confirming an incident that affects their data or service | Communications lead with Legal | What happened, data and services affected, actions, contact |
| Data protection authority | As decided in the personal data breach steps | Data Protection Officer | Per the notice format |
| Sectoral regulators | As their rules require | Legal lead | Per the rules |
| Law enforcement | When a crime is suspected and management agrees | Legal lead | Facts, evidence summary |
| Insurer | Within the notice period in the policy [e.g. 48 hours] | Finance with Legal | Notice of circumstance |
| Employees | As needed to protect them or the business | Communications lead | What they must do or avoid |
| Media or public | Only if needed and approved by senior management | Communications lead | Approved statement |
10. Assessment and Response
10.1 Assessment of information security events
- ReceiveThe analyst on duty receives the ticket or alert and checks it for duplicates. Target: within the acknowledgement time of the provisional severity.
- GatherCollect basic facts: who, what, where, when, how found, affected data and systems, and any indicators. Use logs, alerts and the reporter.
- ClassifyDecide whether it is a false positive, an event, a weakness or an incident, and its type from the event types table.
- RateApply the severity matrix and record the reasons. For Severity 1 or 2, the analyst calls the IRT lead at once.
- DeclareThe IRT lead (Severity 1 and 2) or the security manager (Severity 3 and 4) declares an incident, appoints an incident manager and opens an incident record in the register.
- NotifyTell the owner of the system, the Data Protection Officer if personal data may be involved, and Legal if law or contract may apply.
- DecideAgree the response plan and, if needed, the playbook to follow. False positives are closed with an explanation and used to tune detection.
10.2 Response to incidents
- ContainStop spread: isolate hosts, block accounts and addresses, disable access. Choose short-term actions that protect evidence, and record every action with a time.
- Preserve evidenceBefore changes, copy logs and take images of memory and disks where needed. Maintain chain of custody; evidence is stored in a protected location with limited access.
- InvestigateIdentify entry point, extent, data touched, accounts used and persistence. Search for the same indicators across the environment.
- EradicateRemove malware, close the entry point, rotate credentials and keys, and patch or reconfigure as needed.
- RecoverRestore from clean backups or rebuild, validate integrity, return to service in stages with extra monitoring for [14 days]. Follow the BCP and DR Procedure when the service is disrupted.
- CommunicateUpdate stakeholders at the frequency in the severity matrix and keep a single source of facts.
- CloseClose when the threat is removed, systems are restored, notifications are done and actions are assigned. The IRT lead approves closure of Severity 1 and 2.
| Phase | Typical time target Severity 1 | Output |
|---|
| Detect and report | [Within 1 hour of occurrence being noticed] | Ticket and first facts |
| Assess and declare | [Within 1 hour of report] | Declared incident and incident manager |
| Contain | [4 hours] | Containment log |
| Notify authority and customers | [Authority within 6 hours of noticing; customers 24 hours] | Notices and reference numbers |
| Recover | [Per recovery time objective of the service] | Restored service |
| Post-incident review | [Within 10 working days of closure] | Review report and actions |
10.3 Handling evidence
- Only trained responders collect evidence, using documented methods and trusted tools.
- Each item is labelled with description, date, time, collector and hash, and stored in a locked or restricted location with access logged.
- Original evidence is never worked on directly; analysis uses copies.
- Evidence needed for disciplinary or legal action is kept under legal hold until Legal releases it; otherwise per the retention schedule in the Documents and Records Management Procedure.
10.4 Learning from incidents
- ReviewThe incident manager holds a blameless review within [10 working days] of closure for Severity 1 and 2 and monthly in batch for others, with all roles involved.
- AnalyseEstablish timeline, root cause, contributing factors, what worked, what failed and the cost in time and money.
- ActRaise corrective actions in the ticketing tool, each with an owner and date; update playbooks, rules, training and risk register.
- ShareShare anonymised lessons with staff and, where appropriate, trusted information-sharing groups.
- TrackThe Head of Information Security reports actions open past due to management each quarter.
- TrendEach quarter, analyse the register for repeat types, causes and slow steps; link to the risk register and to problem management.
| Review question | Looking for |
|---|
| How was it noticed and how long before? | Detection gaps and delay |
| What was the root cause? | Technical, process or human factor |
| Was the right severity set, and was it escalated in time? | Process fit |
| Did playbooks and contacts work? | Preparedness |
| Was evidence preserved? | Forensic readiness |
| Were notifications made on time? | Compliance |
| What would have prevented it? | Control improvements |
11. Escalation and On-call Arrangements
| Time since declaration | Severity 1 | Severity 2 | Severity 3 |
|---|
| At declaration | IRT lead, incident manager, Data Protection Officer and Legal lead called by phone | IRT lead and incident manager called | Security manager informed |
| [1 hour] | Senior management briefed; bridge call open | Service owner briefed | Analyst continues |
| [4 hours] | Board chair informed if customer data or service is affected; customer notice decision taken | Head of Information Security briefs senior management if not contained | Review severity |
| [24 hours] | Customer and regulator notices sent where required; daily executive briefing | Customer notice decision taken | Update to line manager |
| [72 hours] | Decision on external specialist, insurer and law enforcement if not already taken | Review of severity and resources | Close or hand to problem management |
- A rota of trained responders covers all hours for Severity 1 and 2. The on-call phone numbers are held by the service desk and tested every [month].
- If the person called does not respond within [15 minutes], the service desk calls the deputy, then the next in the contact list.
- A person on call has a laptop, secure remote access, the playbooks and a copy of the contact list available offline.
- Responders are told in advance which actions they may take without further approval, such as isolating a host or disabling an account.
- Time spent on call is recognised under HR rules, and long incidents are staffed in shifts.
12. Incidents Involving Suppliers and Customers
- Supplier incidentA supplier that finds a breach affecting the Organisation must tell the vendor owner within [24 hours] as the contract requires. The vendor owner opens an incident ticket and the IRT treats it as an event on the Organisation's own estate.
- Assess exposureIdentify what data, credentials, integrations and network paths the supplier has. Suspend or restrict them until the supplier gives assurance.
- Gather evidenceRequest the supplier's incident report, indicators and timeline in writing. Ask for confirmation of containment and of the date of resolution.
- Customer incidentWhen the Organisation's service or staff are implicated in a customer's incident, the account owner tells the incident manager at once, and the customer's contacts are agreed with Legal.
- Joint responseName a single point of contact on each side, agree how often facts are shared, and decide who talks to regulators and the public.
- Follow upRecord supplier performance in the supplier register and take the issue to the next review under the Supplier Relationship Management Procedure.
13. Communication During an Incident
- Facts only: say what is known, what is not known and when the next update will come. Do not guess about cause or blame.
- One spokesperson speaks for the Organisation; staff refer all outside questions to the Communications lead.
- Use the out-of-band channel if email and chat may be compromised, and do not discuss the incident on open channels.
- Messages to customers are cleared by Legal and the Data Protection Officer before sending and are kept in the incident file.
- Internal staff are told what to do and what to avoid, for example not to open an attachment, to change a password or to stay offline.
| Message | Sender | Approval | Timing |
|---|
| First holding notice to staff | Communications lead | Head of Information Security | [Within 2 hours of a Severity 1 declaration] |
| Customer notice of incident | Account owner or Communications lead | Legal lead and Data Protection Officer | [Within the contractual time, or 24 hours] |
| Regulator notice | Legal lead | Senior management | Per the legal duty |
| Individual notice for personal data breach | Data Protection Officer | Senior management and Legal lead | [Without delay after the decision] |
| Final summary to customers | Account owner | Legal lead | [Within 10 working days of closure] |
14. Weaknesses and Near Misses
A weakness found by a person, a scan, an audit or a researcher is reported through the same channel and tracked as an event of Severity 4 unless it is already being exploited. The security analyst records it, rates its risk with the system owner and sets a due date for the fix. Critical weaknesses are handled under the vulnerability and patch procedures within [72 hours], and a weakness found to be exploited becomes an incident. Near misses are recorded because they show control failures at no cost; the quarterly review looks at their causes.
15. Incident Closure Criteria
- The threat is contained and removed, and monitoring shows no further activity for [14 days] (Severity 1 and 2) or [3 days] (others).
- Affected systems are restored or replaced and have passed an integrity check.
- Credentials, keys and tokens that may have been exposed are changed.
- All required notices are sent and the references are in the incident file.
- The register is complete, including cause, impact, timeline and cost.
- Evidence is stored, with legal hold applied where needed.
- Corrective actions are raised with owners and dates, and the review is booked.
- The incident manager and the IRT lead (for Severity 1 and 2) approve closure in the register.
16. RACI Matrix
| Activity | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|---|
| Detect and report an event | All staff | Head of Information Security | Service desk | Security operations |
| Triage and rate | Security operations analysts | Head of Information Security | Application and product owners | Incident manager |
| Declare Severity 1 or 2 incident | Head of Information Security | Head of Information Security | Senior management | Legal counsel |
| Run the incident | Incident manager | Head of Information Security | IT and infrastructure engineers | Senior management |
| Contain and recover systems | IT and infrastructure engineers | Application and product owners | Incident manager | Senior management |
| Preserve evidence | Security operations analysts | Incident manager | Legal counsel | Head of Information Security |
| Assess personal data impact | Data Protection Officer | Senior management | Legal counsel | Incident manager |
| Report to the national cyber authority | Legal counsel | Head of Information Security | Data Protection Officer | Senior management |
| Notify customers and the public | Communications lead | Senior management | Legal counsel | Incident manager |
| Post-incident review and actions | Incident manager | Head of Information Security | All involved roles | Senior management |
| Maintain playbooks and exercises | Security operations analysts | Head of Information Security | IT and infrastructure engineers | Senior management |
17. Measures
| Measure | Target | How measured |
|---|
| Events acknowledged within the severity target | [95 percent] | Ticketing tool |
| Severity 1 and 2 incidents contained within target | [90 percent] | Incident register |
| Mean time to detect (from start to noticing) | [Under 24 hours for Severity 1 and 2] | Incident timeline |
| Mean time to resolve by severity | [Severity 1: 3 days; Severity 2: 7 days] | Incident register |
| Reports to the national cyber authority made within 6 hours of noticing | [100 percent] | Register and submission record |
| Post-incident reviews held on time | [100 percent for Severity 1 and 2] | Register |
| Corrective actions closed on time | [85 percent] | Action tracker |
| IRT exercises completed against plan | [100 percent] | Exercise records |
| Phishing reports as share of simulated mails | [60 percent] | Awareness platform |
18. Records and evidence
| Record | Where kept | Retention |
|---|
| Incident register and incident files | Restricted folder or incident tool under the Head of Information Security | [5 years] |
| Timeline and decision log | Incident file | [5 years] |
| Forensic evidence and chain of custody forms | Evidence store with limited access | [Until closure plus 12 months, longer under legal hold] |
| Notices to authorities, customers and individuals | Incident file and legal repository | [7 years] |
| Post-incident review reports and action tracker | Document management system | [5 years] |
| Exercise reports and playbook versions | Document management system | [3 years] |
| Security logs used in an incident | Log platform and copy in incident file | Per logging policy, with a copy kept for the incident record period |
Annexure A: Incident register
| Ref | Date and time noticed | Reported by | Type | Severity | Systems and data affected | Personal data (Y/N) | Reported to authority (Y/N, time) | Incident manager | Status | Date closed | Root cause | Actions |
|---|
| Example: INC-001 | [date, time] | [name] | Phishing | 3 | [mailbox] | N | N | [name] | Closed | [date] | Credential entered on fake page | Reset, training |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Report number, date and time noticed, time reported | |
| Reporter and contact | |
| What happened (facts only) | |
| Systems, accounts, data and premises affected | |
| Personal data involved (type and number of people) | |
| Initial severity and reason | |
| Actions taken so far | |
| Evidence preserved (what and where) | |
| People and teams informed | |
| Authority or customer notices made (reference and time) | |
Annexure C: Post-incident review template
| Item | Entry |
|---|
| Incident reference, type, final severity | |
| Timeline of key events | |
| Root cause and contributing factors | |
| Impact (data, service, customers, cost) | |
| What worked well | |
| What did not work | |
| Corrective actions (owner, due date) | |
| Documents to update (playbooks, rules, training) | |
| Review date, attendees and approval | |
19. Exception
Exceptions to this document are allowed only where compliance is not practicable and the risk has been assessed. A request must state what is to be excepted, why, the risk it creates, the compensating controls, and an end date no later than [6 months]. It is approved in writing by the document owner and the risk owner, recorded in the exceptions register, and reviewed at the end date. An exception does not change the document.
20. Enforcement
Compliance is monitored through internal audits, management review and routine checks by the document owner. Non-compliance is reported through the incident or non-conformity process and handled under the organisation's disciplinary procedure, and under the terms of any contract for people who are not employees. Serious or repeated non-compliance may lead to loss of access and, where the law is broken, to referral to the authorities.
21. Review
This document is reviewed at least every [12 months], and when there is a significant change to the organisation, its systems, its risks or the law, or after an incident that shows it was not effective. Each review is recorded in the revision history.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 references
| Reference | Title |
|---|
| A.5.24 | Information security incident management planning and preparation |
| A.5.25 | Assessment and decision on information security events |
| A.5.26 | Response to information security incidents |
| A.5.27 | Learning from information security incidents |
| A.5.28 | Collection of evidence |
| A.6.8 | Information security event reporting |
| A.5.5 | Contact with authorities |
| A.5.6 | Contact with special interest groups |