Template draft. Replace everything in [square brackets] with your own decision,
delete what does not describe what you really do, and approve it through your own document control. It is not legal
advice and does not make an organisation compliant or certified.
1. Introduction
A service that is badly designed or carelessly introduced costs far more to repair in live operation than it would have cost to get right beforehand. This procedure sets the stages through which every new service, every significant change to an existing service and every withdrawal of a service must pass, and the evidence required at each gate.
2. Purpose
The purpose is to make sure that new and changed services meet the requirements of customers and other interested parties, can be operated and supported by the people who will run them, are secure and resilient, and move into live operation with the knowledge, tools, agreements and records needed, and that services leave operation without loss of data, obligation or support.
3. Objectives
- Every new or changed service has a recorded set of requirements agreed with the customer or service owner before design starts.
- No service enters production without a design package that has passed verification, and without acceptance by the service owner and operations.
- Service level, capacity, availability, continuity and security requirements are designed in, and each one is tested before acceptance.
- Every transition has a plan with dates, owners, risks and a backout route that is reviewed at the transition gate.
- [90%] of transitions complete within the planned dates and budget, and fewer than [5%] cause a major incident in the first [30 days].
- Every transition ends with a review within [30 days] of go-live and the lessons are recorded.
4. Scope
- In scope: new services; changes to services that alter targets, scope, location, supplier or technology in a way that needs design (a major change); the retirement or transfer of services.
- In scope: planning of the transition, the service design package, acceptance criteria, testing, handover to operations and closure.
- Out of scope: routine and standard changes to a live service (see the Change Management Procedure), and the build and release mechanics of software (see the Release and Deployment Management Procedure and the System Development and Maintenance Procedure).
- Applies to: service design manager, project and transition managers, service owners, architects, engineers, test leads, resolver groups, service desk, information security, suppliers and customer representatives.
5. Terms and definitions
| Term | Meaning |
|---|
| Service design package | The set of documents that describes a service well enough to build, test, operate and support it. |
| Service acceptance criteria | The measurable conditions that a new or changed service must meet before it is accepted for live operation. |
| Transition plan | The plan of activities, dates, owners, risks and controls that moves a service from design to live operation. |
| Early life support | A defined period after go-live with extra support and tighter monitoring. |
| Design gate | A decision point at which the next stage may start only if stated evidence exists. |
| Retirement | The planned removal of a service or component from live operation. |
6. Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|
| Process owner | Owns this procedure and the gate criteria, approves exceptions to the gates and sponsors improvements. |
| Service design manager | Runs the process, maintains templates, chairs the design review, and tracks every transition on the transition schedule. |
| Service owner | Owns the requirements and the outcome, approves the design, decides acceptance and answers for the service after go-live. |
| Transition manager | Plans and coordinates the transition, controls risks, reports progress and prepares closure. |
| Architect | Produces the design, ensures it meets technical, security and capacity needs, and takes part in verification. |
| Test lead | Plans and runs tests, records results and defects, and states whether acceptance criteria are met. |
| Resolver groups and service desk | Review the design for supportability, accept the runbooks, attend training and take over operation. |
| Information security | Sets security requirements, reviews the design and results of tests for security. |
| Change authority and release manager | Approve and schedule the changes and releases that carry the transition. |
| Customer representative | Confirms requirements and takes part in acceptance testing. |
| Activity | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|---|
| Capture and agree requirements | Service owner | Service owner | Customer representative, Architect | Service design manager |
| Produce service design package | Architect | Service design manager | Resolver groups, Information security | Service owner |
| Verify design | Service design manager | Process owner | Architect, Test lead, Information security | Service owner |
| Plan transition | Transition manager | Service owner | Release manager, Change authority | Resolver groups |
| Test and report | Test lead | Transition manager | Customer representative, Information security | Service owner |
| Accept service for live use | Service owner | Process owner | Resolver groups, Customer representative | Top management |
| Hand over to operations | Transition manager | Service owner | Service desk, Resolver groups | Customer representative |
| Close transition and review | Transition manager | Service design manager | Service owner | Top management |
7. Service Design and Transition Process
7.1 Inputs and outputs
| Inputs | Outputs |
|---|
| Business case, customer request or approved change proposal | Agreed requirements and acceptance criteria |
| Service catalogue and portfolio, existing service level agreements | Service design package |
| Capacity, availability, continuity and security requirements | Transition plan and risk log |
| Supplier proposals and contracts | Test plans, results and acceptance decision |
| Risk assessments and lessons from earlier transitions | Updated catalogue, CMDB, runbooks, training records |
| Budget and resource approval | Closure report and lessons learned |
7.2 Process flow and gates
- A proposal for a new, changed or retired service is registered by the service owner on the transition schedule.
- Requirements are captured and agreed (gate 1: requirements approved).
- The service design package is created or updated (gate 2: design verified).
- The transition plan is created, and the build and test environment prepared (gate 3: ready to test).
- Testing and acceptance are carried out (gate 4: service accepted).
- Rollout through change and release management, followed by handover to operations (gate 5: go-live authorised, then handover accepted).
- Early life support runs for the agreed period.
- Verification, review and closure (gate 6: transition closed).
| Gate | Decision | Decision maker | Evidence required |
|---|
| 1. Requirements approved | Design may start | Service owner and process owner | Signed requirements, acceptance criteria, funding, risk screening |
| 2. Design verified | Build may start | Service design manager | Design package, review record, security and capacity sign-off |
| 3. Ready to test | Testing may start | Transition manager | Test plan, environment ready, test data approved |
| 4. Service accepted | Go-live may be requested | Service owner | Test results meeting criteria, open defects accepted, runbooks and training done |
| 5. Go-live authorised | Change may be implemented | Change authority | Approved change and release records, backout plan, communications sent |
| 6. Transition closed | Project resources released | Process owner | Early life support complete, review held, records updated |
7.3 Capture new or changed service requirements
- Register the proposalThe service owner or project sponsor raises a transition request that states the purpose, expected benefits, customers, dates and budget. Output: entry on the transition schedule. Target: [2 working days] after the proposal is approved in principle.
- Screen for riskThe service design manager assesses scale, novelty, number of suppliers, data sensitivity and effect on existing services, and sets the transition level (small, medium or large). Target: [3 working days]. Large transitions require a risk assessment under the Product Risk Assessment Procedure.
- Gather requirementsThe service owner works with customers and interested parties to document functional needs, service levels, hours, volumes, capacity, availability and continuity needs, security and privacy needs, legal and contract needs, support model and reporting. Owner: service owner. Target: [10 working days] for a medium transition.
- Define acceptance criteriaEach requirement is given a way to prove it is met, using the acceptance criteria table. Owner: service owner with the test lead.
- ApproveRequirements are reviewed by architect, resolver groups, finance and information security. The service owner approves them. Output: signed requirements (gate 1).
- Control change to requirementsA change to approved requirements is recorded, assessed for cost, time and risk, and approved by the service owner before the design is changed.
| Requirement area | Questions the requirements must answer |
|---|
| Service levels | What availability, response, resolution and performance targets? Which hours? |
| Volume and growth | How many users, transactions and how fast will they grow? What are the peaks? |
| Security and privacy | What data, what classification, what controls, what laws apply? |
| Continuity | How long can the service be down, and how much data can be lost? |
| Support | Who supports at which tier? What training and tools are needed? |
| Commercial | What is the budget, the contract, the charging model and the supplier role? |
| Retirement or exit | How will the service and its data be withdrawn if the need ends? |
7.4 Create or update the service design
- Plan the designThe architect and service design manager agree design tasks, owners and dates. Output: design plan.
- Design the serviceProduce the service design package covering the items below. Owner: architect. Target: [15 working days] for a medium transition.
- Review for supportabilityResolver groups and the service desk review the package for how the service will be operated, monitored and supported. Findings are logged and answered.
- Update related documentsThe service catalogue entry, service level agreement, operational level agreements and supplier contracts are drafted or updated in step with the design. Owner: service owner.
- Version and baselineThe package is stored under document control with a version and approval date.
The service design package contains at least the following.
- The service description, scope, customers and service owner.
- Architecture, data flows, interfaces, and the configuration items to be created or changed.
- Service level targets, measurement methods and reporting content.
- Capacity, availability and continuity design, including recovery objectives.
- Security and privacy design, with the risk assessment and control list.
- Roles, support model, runbooks, monitoring and alert design, and training needs.
- Suppliers and agreements, costs and charging.
- Transition approach, test approach and backout approach.
- Exit and retirement approach for the service.
7.5 Design verification
Verification checks that the design meets the approved requirements and can be built, tested and operated. It is done at a design review that includes people who did not produce the design.
- PrepareThe design manager issues the package to reviewers at least [3 working days] before the review.
- ReviewReviewers check traceability from each requirement to a design element, and answer the checklist below. A finding is rated blocking, major or minor.
- ResolveBlocking and major findings are fixed and re-checked before gate 2. Minor findings are accepted with owner and date.
- ApproveThe service design manager records the decision (approved, approved with conditions, or rejected) with the names of reviewers. Output: design review record.
| Checklist question | Evidence |
|---|
| Is every requirement traced to the design? | Traceability table |
| Do the targets match the customer commitments, and the supplier commitments underneath them? | Service level and supplier agreement comparison |
| Is capacity sufficient for the forecast demand with headroom? | Capacity sign-off by the capacity manager |
| Are recovery objectives met by the continuity design? | Continuity sign-off |
| Are security and privacy controls designed, and risks accepted by the risk owner? | Information security sign-off |
| Can resolver groups support it with the runbooks and monitoring planned? | Resolver group sign-off |
| Is the exit approach credible? | Exit approach in the package |
7.6 Transition of the new or changed service
- Create the transition planThe transition manager writes the plan: activities, dates, owners, environments, dependencies, risks, communications, training, data migration, go-live window, backout, early life support and acceptance. Output: transition plan. Target: [5 working days] after gate 2.
- Assess riskRisks to customers, to live services and to security are listed with owners and controls. High risks are escalated to the service owner and the process owner.
- Authorise resourcesThe service owner confirms budget and staff; finance confirms funding.
- Prepare the buildEnvironments, test data and tooling are prepared; configuration items are registered as planned in the CMDB under the Configuration and Asset Management Procedure.
- TrackThe transition manager reports progress, risks and issues [weekly] to the service owner and updates the transition schedule.
Note. Anything that will change a live service goes through the Change Management Procedure. The transition plan does not replace a change record; it is attached to it.
7.7 Testing and acceptance
- Plan testsThe test lead writes the test plan: scope, types, environments, data, entry and exit criteria, defect handling and who attends. It is reviewed by the service owner. Owner: test lead.
- Run testsTests are executed and results recorded against each acceptance criterion. Defects are logged with severity. Retests are done after fixes.
- Test operationResolver groups run operational acceptance: monitoring alerts fire, backups and restores work, failover works, runbooks are correct and the service desk can handle typical questions.
- Test with customersCustomer representatives take part in user acceptance testing where the service is customer-facing. Their sign-off is recorded.
- ReportThe test lead issues a test report with criteria met and not met and all open defects, and recommends accept or reject. Target: [2 working days] after testing ends.
- DecideThe service owner decides at gate 4 to accept, accept with conditions, or reject. Conditions have owners and dates. Output: acceptance record.
| Test type | Purpose | Typical exit criterion |
|---|
| Functional | The service does what was required | [100%] of critical cases pass; no open critical or major defect |
| Performance and capacity | Volumes and response times are met | Targets met at [120%] of expected peak |
| Security | Controls work and no serious weakness | No open high-risk finding; vulnerability and access checks done |
| Recovery and continuity | The service can be restored in time | Recovery within the recovery time objective |
| Operational readiness | People and tools can run the service | Runbooks, alerts and on-call tested; training complete |
| User acceptance | Customers confirm it meets needs | Signed by customer representative |
7.8 Rollout and handover to operations
- Request go-liveThe transition manager raises the change and release request with the test report, acceptance record and backout plan. The change authority decides under the Change Management Procedure; the release manager deploys under the Release and Deployment Management Procedure.
- CommunicateCustomers, users, the service desk and suppliers are told what will change, when and how to get help, at least [3 working days] before go-live for a customer-facing change.
- Go-liveThe deployment runs in the approved window. The transition manager and release manager confirm completion, run post-implementation checks and decide on backout if criteria are not met.
- Hand overHandover is accepted by the resolver groups and the service desk: documents, runbooks, contacts, monitoring, known errors and open defects are transferred. The handover record is signed. Target: [at go-live].
- Early life supportExtra support and daily review of incidents run for [30 days] for a large transition and [10 days] for a medium one. The transition team stays on call.
- Update recordsThe service catalogue, CMDB, service level agreement, supplier register and knowledge base are updated within [5 working days].
Retirement of a service follows the same gates in reverse: requirements are the customer notice period and data obligations; the plan covers notice, data return or deletion, migration of customers, removal of access and configuration items, termination of supplier agreements, and removal from the catalogue. The service is removed from production only after the service owner confirms in writing that notice has run and data has been dealt with.
7.9 Verification, review and closure
- Verify outcomesAfter early life support the service owner and transition manager compare results with the requirements: targets met, incidents, customer feedback, cost against budget. Target: [30 days] after go-live.
- Hold the reviewA review meeting records what went well, what did not, and the causes. Findings go to the improvement log under the Service Reporting and Continual Improvement Procedure.
- Close open itemsOpen defects and conditions are moved to problem, change or improvement records with owners; none is left on the transition record.
- CloseThe process owner closes the transition, releases project resources and archives the records.
Note. A transition cannot close while any condition of acceptance is open without an owner and date.
8. Interfaces with other processes
| Process | Interface |
|---|
| Service catalogue management | New and changed services are added to or changed in the catalogue at go-live; retired services are removed. |
| Service level management | Targets are agreed during requirements and recorded in agreements. |
| Capacity, availability and continuity management | Their requirements are designed in and tested. |
| Change management and release and deployment | They carry out the live implementation. |
| Configuration management | Configuration items are registered at design and activated at go-live. |
| Information security management for services | Security requirements and tests are part of gates 1, 2 and 4. |
| Supplier management | Supplier agreements are drafted in step with the design. |
| Incident and problem management | Known errors and support information are handed over and used in early life support. |
9. Key Performance Indicators
| Measure | Target | Source | Frequency |
|---|
| Transitions delivered on the planned date | [85%] | Transition schedule | Quarterly |
| Transitions delivered within budget | [85%] | Finance records | Quarterly |
| Transitions passing each gate at first attempt | [80%] | Gate records | Quarterly |
| Services accepted with all critical and major defects closed | [100%] | Acceptance records | Per transition |
| Major incidents in first [30 days] of a new or changed service | Fewer than [5%] of transitions | Incident records | Quarterly |
| Reviews held within [30 days] of go-live | [95%] | Review records | Quarterly |
| Catalogue and CMDB updated within target after go-live | [95%] | Catalogue and CMDB audit | Quarterly |
| Customer satisfaction with the new or changed service | [4 out of 5] | Survey | Per transition |
10. Records and evidence
| Record | Kept in | Owner | Retention |
|---|
| Transition request and schedule | Project tool | Service design manager | [3 years] |
| Requirements and acceptance criteria | Document management system | Service owner | Life of the service plus [3 years] |
| Service design package and review record | Document management system | Service design manager | Life of the service plus [3 years] |
| Test plans, results and defects | Test management tool | Test lead | [3 years] |
| Acceptance and handover records | Document management system | Transition manager | Life of the service plus [3 years] |
| Closure report and lessons learned | Document management system | Transition manager | [5 years] |
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Request reference and date | |
| Service name and type (new, changed, retired) | |
| Service owner and sponsor | |
| Purpose and expected benefit | |
| Customers and users affected | |
| Target go-live date | |
| Budget and funding source | |
| Transition level (small, medium, large) | |
| Initial risks | |
| Approved by and date | |
Annexure B: Service acceptance criteria
| Ref | Requirement | Acceptance criterion | How tested | Result | Accepted by |
|---|
| [AC-01] | [Availability] | [99.9% in test month] | [Monitoring during pilot] | | |
| [AC-02] | [Recovery] | [Restore within 2 hours] | [Recovery test] | | |
| [AC-03] | [Support] | [Runbooks tested by L2] | [Walkthrough] | | |
| | | | | |
Annexure C: Handover checklist and acceptance record
| Item | Provided | Accepted by (name and date) | Comment |
|---|
| Runbooks and operating instructions | | | |
| Monitoring and alert configuration | | | |
| Known errors and open defects | | | |
| Training given to service desk and resolvers | | | |
| Contact list and escalation path | | | |
| Service catalogue and CMDB updated | | | |
| Service level agreement and supplier agreements signed | | | |
Annexure: Document history
| Version | Date | Author | Reviewed by | Approved by | Summary of change |
|---|
| [1.0] | [date of issue] | [Process manager] | [Process owner] | [Management representative] | Initial issue of SM13 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
11. Exception
Exceptions to this document are allowed only where compliance is not practicable and the risk has been assessed. A request must state what is to be excepted, why, the risk it creates, the compensating controls, and an end date no later than [6 months]. It is approved in writing by the document owner and the risk owner, recorded in the exceptions register, and reviewed at the end date. An exception does not change the document.
12. Enforcement
Compliance is monitored through internal audits, management review and routine checks by the document owner. Non-compliance is reported through the incident or non-conformity process and handled under the organisation's disciplinary procedure, and under the terms of any contract for people who are not employees. Serious or repeated non-compliance may lead to loss of access and, where the law is broken, to referral to the authorities.
13. Review
This document is reviewed at least every [12 months], and when there is a significant change to the organisation, its systems, its risks or the law, or after an incident that shows it was not effective. Each review is recorded in the revision history.
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 references
| Reference | Title |
|---|
| 8.5.2 | Service design and transition |
| 8.5.1 | Change management |
| 8.5.3 | Release and deployment management |
| 6.3 | Plan the SMS |