Template draft. Replace everything in [square brackets] with your own decision,
delete what does not describe what you really do, and approve it through your own document control. It is not legal
advice and does not make an organisation compliant or certified.
1. Purpose
This statement records the objectives that top management has set for the service management system and the services, so that each commitment in the Service Management Policy has a number against it, an owner, and a date when it will be judged. It is the reference used by process owners to plan their work and by top management to review it.
- Translate policy commitments into targets that can be measured with the data the Organisation already collects.
- Give every objective one owner who is accountable for the result.
- Make clear how and when an objective is reviewed, changed or retired.
2. Scope
The objectives cover the SMS and all services in its scope, from the service catalogue. They are set for the [financial year] and reviewed during it.
- In scope: objectives for customer outcomes, service delivery, process performance, supplier and asset control, resilience and security, people, and improvement.
- In scope: the service level targets that the Organisation applies by default in service level agreements (section 8).
- Out of scope: individual performance targets for employees and commercial targets such as revenue; these are handled by management and Human Resources.
3. Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibilities for objectives |
|---|
| Top management | Approves the objectives each year; resolves conflicts between objectives; allocates resources to reach them. |
| Management representative | Maintains this statement; consolidates results; reports to top management before each management review. |
| Objective owner | Plans how the objective will be achieved, collects the measure, explains variation, proposes corrective action. |
| Service owners | Propose service-level objectives and confirm customer targets are consistent with them. |
| Process owners | Propose process objectives and keep measures reliable. |
| Internal auditors | Check that objectives exist for the policy commitments and that results are evidenced. |
| Activity | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|---|
| Propose objectives for the year | Service and process owners | Management representative | Customer representatives | Top management |
| Approve objectives | Management representative | Top management | Service and process owners | All personnel |
| Collect and report measures | Objective owners | Process owners | Management representative | Top management |
| Review results and agree action | Management representative | Top management | Objective owners | All personnel |
| Change or retire an objective | Management representative | Top management | Objective owner | Affected teams |
4. How Objectives Are Set and Managed
4.1 Criteria
Every objective in this statement must meet the following criteria, checked by the management representative before approval.
| Criterion | Test applied |
|---|
| Consistent with the policy | Traceable to a commitment in the the Policy Commitments in the Service Management Policy |
| Measurable | Has a numeric target and a defined measure with a data source |
| Owned | Has one named owner with authority to act |
| Time-bound | Has a review frequency and an annual end date |
| Relevant to requirements | Takes account of contract, regulatory and customer requirements |
| Achievable | Resources have been identified, or a request raised |
An objective that fails a criterion is returned to its proposer; it is not approved with a blank.
4.2 Annual cycle
- ReviewIn [month] the management representative reviews last year's results, audit findings, customer feedback and the Context of the Organization.
- ProposeService owners and process owners propose objectives and targets within [20 working days].
- ApproveTop management approves the set at the first management review of the year.
- PlanEach owner completes an objective plan (Annexure A) within [20 working days] of approval.
- CommunicateThe objectives are published on [the intranet] and discussed in the quarterly all-hands briefing.
- Monitor and adjustResults are reported monthly or quarterly; a target is changed only by top management and recorded in the document history.
4.3 Rating of results
| Status | Meaning | Required action |
|---|
| Green | Target met or exceeded | None; consider raising the target next year |
| Amber | Within [5 percent] of target, or trend adverse for [2] periods | Owner explains cause and recovery in the next report |
| Red | Further than [5 percent] below target, or missed for [2] consecutive periods | Owner raises a corrective action; management representative reports to top management within [10 working days] |
5. Service Management Objectives
The objectives below are defaults for the Organisation to adopt or adjust. Each target in brackets is a decision for the adopter.
5.1 Customer and service outcomes
| Ref | Objective | Owner | Target | Measure and source | Frequency |
|---|
| O1 | Customers are satisfied with the services they use | Service owners | [4.2 out of 5] | Average score in the customer survey; survey tool | [Twice a year] |
| O2 | Service level agreement targets are met | Service owners | [95 percent] of targets met | SLA report from ticketing and monitoring tools | [Monthly] |
| O3 | Critical services are available when customers need them | Service owners | [99.9 percent] in agreed hours | Monitoring tool availability report | [Monthly] |
| O4 | Complaints are handled promptly | Service owners | [100 percent] acknowledged in [1 working day]; [90 percent] resolved in [10 working days] | Complaint register | [Quarterly] |
| O5 | Every customer has a current agreed SLA | Service owners | [100 percent] | SLA register | [Quarterly] |
| O6 | Customer requirements are reviewed on schedule | Service owners | [100 percent] of SLAs reviewed in [12 months] | SLA register review dates | [Quarterly] |
5.2 Resolution and fulfilment
| Ref | Objective | Owner | Target | Measure and source | Frequency |
|---|
| O7 | Incidents are resolved within the severity targets | Process owner, incident management | [95 percent] within target | Ticketing tool incident report | [Monthly] |
| O8 | Users are helped at first contact where possible | Service desk lead | [70 percent] first contact resolution | Ticketing tool resolution codes | [Monthly] |
| O9 | Major incidents are reviewed and lessons recorded | Incident manager | [100 percent] reviewed within [5 working days] | Post-incident review records | [Per incident and quarterly] |
| O10 | Service requests are fulfilled on time | Process owner, request fulfilment | [95 percent] within catalogue target | Ticketing tool request report | [Monthly] |
| O11 | Repeat incidents fall | Process owner, problem management | [10 percent] fewer than prior year | Incident records by category | [Quarterly] |
| O12 | Problem root causes are found promptly | Process owner, problem management | [90 percent] within target by priority | Problem records | [Monthly] |
5.3 Change, release and configuration
| Ref | Objective | Owner | Target | Measure and source | Frequency |
|---|
| O13 | Changes succeed without causing incidents | Process owner, change management | [97 percent] successful | Change records linked to incidents | [Monthly] |
| O14 | Emergency changes are kept to a minimum | Change authority | Not more than [5 percent] of all changes | Change records | [Monthly] |
| O15 | No unauthorised changes reach live services | Change authority | [0] unauthorised changes | Audit and detection reports | [Monthly] |
| O16 | Releases are deployed to plan | Release manager | [95 percent] on the planned date without rollback | Release records | [Monthly] |
| O17 | Configuration records are accurate | Configuration manager | [98 percent] match in sample | Verification sample results | [Monthly] |
| O18 | Licensed software is within entitlement | Configuration manager | [100 percent] compliant | Licence reconciliation | [Every 6 months] |
5.4 Capacity, suppliers and finance
| Ref | Objective | Owner | Target | Measure and source | Frequency |
|---|
| O19 | Capacity meets demand without service impact | Capacity manager | [0] capacity-related incidents of severity 1 or 2 | Incident records tagged by cause | [Quarterly] |
| O20 | Capacity plans are current | Capacity manager | [100 percent] of Tier 1 services have a plan updated in [6 months] | Capacity plan register | [Every 6 months] |
| O21 | Critical suppliers perform to contract | Supplier manager | [100 percent] of critical supplier targets met | Supplier review reports | [Quarterly] |
| O22 | Supplier reviews happen on schedule | Supplier manager | [100 percent] held in the quarter due | Supplier review calendar | [Quarterly] |
| O23 | Service costs are within budget | Service owners | Variance within [10 percent] | Finance reports by service | [Monthly] |
5.5 Resilience and security
| Ref | Objective | Owner | Target | Measure and source | Frequency |
|---|
| O24 | Continuity plans are tested as scheduled | Continuity manager | [100 percent] of scheduled tests held | Test schedule and reports | [Quarterly] |
| O25 | Recovery objectives are met in tests | Continuity manager | [100 percent] of Tier 1 tests meet recovery time objective | Test reports | [Per test] |
| O26 | Service-affecting security incidents are handled on time | Information security lead | [95 percent] closed within severity target | Security incident register | [Monthly] |
| O27 | Security requirements are verified before service acceptance | Service owners | [100 percent] of new or changed services | Acceptance records | [Quarterly] |
5.6 People, governance and improvement
| Ref | Objective | Owner | Target | Measure and source | Frequency |
|---|
| O28 | People are competent and aware | Human Resources | [95 percent] complete required training within [30 days] | Training records | [Quarterly] |
| O29 | Documents are reviewed on time | Document controller | [95 percent] reviewed by due date | Document register | [Quarterly] |
| O30 | Audit findings are closed on time | Management representative | [90 percent] closed by the agreed date | Nonconformity register | [Quarterly] |
| O31 | Management review is held and actions completed | Management representative | Held every [6 months]; [90 percent] of actions on time | Review minutes and action tracker | [Every 6 months] |
| O32 | Planned improvements are delivered | Management representative | [80 percent] of approved items delivered by date | Improvement log | [Quarterly] |
6. Objectives Mapped to Policy Commitments
Each commitment in the Service Management Policy is supported by at least one objective. The management representative checks this mapping when objectives are proposed, and the internal audit uses it to test that the policy is being carried out.
| Policy commitment | Objectives that support it | Lead owner |
|---|
| Understand customers and meet agreed requirements | O1 to O6 | Service owners |
| Provide resources for the SMS and services | O23, O28 | Top management |
| Plan, measure and review services and processes | O7 to O22, O29 to O31 | Process owners |
| Meet legal, regulatory, contractual and customer requirements, including security | O15, O18, O26, O27 | Management representative |
| Control suppliers and internal groups that contribute to services | O21, O22 | Supplier manager |
| Continually improve the SMS and the services | O30 to O32 | Management representative |
Note. An objective that supports no commitment is questioned at the annual proposal step; a commitment with no objective is a gap that top management must close before the objectives are approved.
7. Worked Example of an Objective Plan
The example shows how objective O7 (incident resolution) is planned. Owners complete the same fields for each objective.
| Field | Example entry |
|---|
| Objective | O7 Incidents are resolved within the severity targets |
| Target and measure | [95 percent] within target, from the ticketing tool incident report, by severity |
| Baseline | [Last 12 months: 91 percent] |
| Actions | Review the resolver group queue weekly; add runbooks for the top [10] incident categories; agree an escalation rota with L3 engineering |
| Resources | [8 days of senior engineer time per month]; knowledge base licence already held |
| Milestones | Runbooks done by [end of Q2]; escalation rota live by [end of Q1] |
| Evaluation | Monthly report; judged at the management review in [month] |
| Risks | Staff turnover in resolver groups; peak demand during releases |
Where the baseline is far from the target, the owner may set an interim milestone, for example [93 percent] by mid-year, provided top management approves it and the final target is not removed.
8. Service Level Targets Applied by Default
Unless a customer agreement states otherwise, the following default targets apply to services in the catalogue. Detail of how they are measured is in the Service Operating Model and the Service Level Management Procedure.
| Measure | Critical (1) | High (2) | Medium (3) | Low (4) |
|---|
| Response to an incident | [15 minutes] | [30 minutes] | [2 hours] | [1 working day] |
| Resolution of an incident | [4 hours] | [8 hours] | [3 working days] | [10 working days] |
| Update frequency to the user | [Every 30 minutes] | [Every 2 hours] | [Daily] | [On resolution] |
| Fulfilment of a standard request | Not applicable | Not applicable | [2 working days] | [5 working days] |
| Acknowledgement of a request | Not applicable | [15 minutes] | [1 working hour] | [4 working hours] |
Note. Response and resolution times run only within the hours of service stated in the catalogue entry for the service.
9. Monitoring, Reporting and Review
Objective owners supply their measures by the [fifth working day] after the end of the period. The management representative publishes a consolidated objectives report within [10 working days] and presents it at the management review. Objectives that are red in two consecutive periods are placed on the agenda of the next management review with a recovery plan.
| Activity | Who | When |
|---|
| Collect measures | Objective owners | [By the 5th working day of the following period] |
| Publish the objectives report | Management representative | [Within 10 working days of period end] |
| Review results with process owners | Management representative | [Monthly] |
| Review with top management | Top management | [Every 6 months at management review] |
| Restate the objectives for the year | Top management | [First management review of the year] |
When a target changes, the previous value, new value, date, approver and reason are recorded in the document history. Retired objectives remain in the history with the closing date and result.
10. Records and Evidence
- Approved objectives and approval date [5 years].
- Objective plans and status reports [5 years].
- Source data extracts supporting reported figures, as exported from the ticketing and monitoring tools [3 years].
- Management review minutes recording decisions on objectives [5 years].
Annexure A: Objective plan
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Objective reference and title | |
| Linked policy commitment | |
| Owner | |
| Target and measure | |
| Actions and milestones | |
| Resources needed (people, tools, budget) | |
| Completion date | |
| How results will be evaluated | |
| Risks and dependencies | |
| Approved by and date | |
Annexure B: Objectives status report
| Ref | Target | Actual | Status (G/A/R) | Cause of variation | Action and date |
|---|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Annexure C: Document history
| Version | Date | Author | Approved by | Summary of change |
|---|
| 1.0 | [dd-mm-yyyy] | [Management representative] | [Top management] | First issue |
| | | | |
11. Exception
Exceptions to this document are allowed only where compliance is not practicable and the risk has been assessed. A request must state what is to be excepted, why, the risk it creates, the compensating controls, and an end date no later than [6 months]. It is approved in writing by the document owner and the risk owner, recorded in the exceptions register, and reviewed at the end date. An exception does not change the document.
12. Enforcement
Compliance is monitored through internal audits, management review and routine checks by the document owner. Non-compliance is reported through the incident or non-conformity process and handled under the organisation's disciplinary procedure, and under the terms of any contract for people who are not employees. Serious or repeated non-compliance may lead to loss of access and, where the law is broken, to referral to the authorities.
13. Review
This document is reviewed at least every [12 months], and when there is a significant change to the organisation, its systems, its risks or the law, or after an incident that shows it was not effective. Each review is recorded in the revision history.
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 references
| Reference | Title |
|---|
| 6.2 | Service management objectives and planning to achieve them |
| 5.2 | Policy |
| 9.1 | Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation |
| 9.3 | Management review |