Template draft. Replace everything in [square brackets] with your own decision,
delete what does not describe what you really do, and approve it through your own document control. It is not legal
advice and does not make an organisation compliant or certified.
1. Introduction
An incident is an unplanned interruption to a service or a reduction in its quality. This procedure covers every such event that is reported by a user, detected by monitoring or raised by a supplier, from the moment it is noticed until the user confirms that service is restored and the record is closed.
The aim is restoration of service within the agreed time, not diagnosis of the underlying cause. Finding and removing the cause belongs to the Problem Management Procedure; changes needed to restore service follow the Change Management Procedure.
2. Purpose
This procedure ensures that service incidents are recorded once, classified consistently, worked in order of business impact, escalated before targets are breached, and closed only with evidence that service is restored. It gives the service desk, resolver groups and managers one shared set of rules, so that two people handling the same event reach the same priority and the same next step.
3. Objectives
- Restore service within the resolution target for the priority of the incident, for at least [95%] of incidents each month.
- Respond to every incident within the response target, and tell the user who owns it and what happens next.
- Make sure no incident is lost: every contact, alert or supplier notice that affects a service becomes a numbered record.
- Keep users and customers informed at the intervals promised for the priority, without having to ask.
- Give problem management the data it needs: accurate categories, linked configuration items and a clear record of what restored service.
- Keep the share of incidents that are reopened within [7 days] of closure below [5%].
4. Scope
- In scope: incidents on every service in the service catalogue, raised by users, customers, monitoring tools, suppliers or staff, during and outside normal service hours.
- In scope: major incidents, and incidents that are also information security events (these are handled together with the Incident Management Procedure).
- Out of scope: requests for something new or standard (see the Service Request Management Procedure), complaints about the service in general (see the Business Relationship Management Procedure), and planned outages approved through change management.
- Applies to: the service desk, resolver groups, service owners, the supplier manager for supplier-owned resolvers, and every person who reports or works on an incident.
5. Terms and definitions
| Term | Meaning |
|---|
| Incident | An unplanned interruption to a service, or a reduction in the quality of a service, including a failure that has not yet affected users. |
| Major incident | An incident of very high impact that needs a coordinated response outside the normal flow, as set by the criteria in this procedure. |
| Impact | The measure of how far the incident affects users, customers, business functions or commitments. |
| Urgency | The measure of how quickly the business needs the incident resolved. |
| Priority | The order in which incidents are worked, derived from impact and urgency using the priority matrix. |
| Workaround | A temporary way of getting the user working again without removing the cause. |
| Functional escalation | Passing an incident to a team with deeper skill or access. |
| Hierarchical escalation | Informing or involving a more senior manager because a target is at risk or the impact is growing. |
| Resolver group | A team with the skills and access to resolve incidents on a defined set of services or configuration items. |
6. Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|
| Process owner | Owns this procedure, the priority matrix and the targets. Approves changes to them. Chairs the monthly incident review. |
| Process manager (Service Desk Manager) | Runs the process day to day, monitors queues against targets, decides escalations and reports performance. |
| Service desk analyst | Logs, categorises and prioritises incidents, provides first-line resolution, keeps users updated, and closes incidents with the user's agreement. |
| Resolver group | Diagnoses and restores service for assigned incidents, records actions as they are taken, and returns incidents to the service desk or closes them as agreed. |
| Incident coordinator | Owns an incident that crosses several teams, chases actions and keeps the record accurate. Appointed by the process manager when needed. |
| Major incident manager | Leads the response to a major incident, sets the cadence of updates and decides when it is declared resolved. |
| Service owner | Accountable for the service. Decides on trade-offs during a major incident and approves the review findings. |
| Supplier manager | Obtains response from suppliers that own a resolver role and applies the contract remedies when targets are missed. |
| Customer representative | Receives customer-facing updates for major incidents, and confirms the customer's priority where it differs from the default. |
| Top management | Kept informed of major incidents, and supplies resources when the response needs authority beyond the service owner's. |
| Activity | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|---|
| Log and categorise incidents | Service desk analyst | Process manager | Resolver group | Service owner |
| Set and change priority | Service desk analyst | Process manager | Service owner | Customer representative |
| Resolve incidents | Resolver group | Service owner | Service desk analyst | Process manager |
| Escalate functionally | Service desk analyst | Process manager | Resolver group | Service owner |
| Escalate hierarchically | Process manager | Process owner | Service owner | Top management |
| Manage a major incident | Major incident manager | Service owner | Resolver group, Customer representative | Top management |
| Communicate with users | Service desk analyst | Process manager | Service owner | Customer representative |
| Close incidents | Service desk analyst | Process manager | User | Resolver group |
| Review incident trends | Process manager | Process owner | Problem manager, Service owner | Top management |
7. Incident Management Process
The process runs from detection to closure. Time targets run from the moment the incident is logged unless stated, and are counted in service hours as defined in the service level agreement for the service.
7.1 Inputs and outputs
| Inputs | Outputs |
|---|
| Telephone call, portal form, email or chat message from a user | An incident record with a unique number, category, priority and owner |
| Monitoring alert that has crossed an incident threshold | Restored service and a documented resolution |
| Supplier notice of failure or degraded service | Updates sent to users at the agreed intervals |
| Service catalogue, priority matrix and escalation contacts | Closure confirmation from the user |
| Configuration records and known error database | Linked problem or change records where the cause needs further action |
| Major incident criteria and call-out list | Major incident report and review actions |
7.2 Logging
- Record every contactThe service desk analyst opens an incident for each event within [5 minutes] of receipt, in [the ticketing tool], whatever the channel. Telephone and chat contacts are logged during the contact; emails are logged on first reading. Alerts that open incidents automatically are checked by the analyst within [10 minutes].
- Search firstBefore creating a new record the analyst searches for open incidents on the same service and configuration item. A duplicate is linked to the parent record rather than worked separately.
- Capture the mandatory fieldsThe record must hold the fields in Annexure A before it can be assigned: reporter, contact route, service, configuration item, symptom, time of onset, business effect, number of users affected, category and priority.
- Confirm with the userThe analyst gives the user the incident number, the priority and the next update time, in the user's channel, within [15 minutes] of logging.
7.3 Categorisation
Categories let the process route the incident to the right team and let problem management see where failures cluster. The analyst chooses a category and sub-category from the list below, and may change it when diagnosis shows the first choice was wrong. A record may not be closed with a category of Other.
| Category | Sub-categories (examples) | Default resolver group |
|---|
| Application | Customer-facing platform fault; internal business application; integration or interface failure; performance | Application support |
| Infrastructure | Server or virtual machine; storage; database; cloud service; backup job | Technical operations |
| Network | Link failure; firewall rule; DNS; VPN; wireless | Network team |
| End-user | Laptop or desktop; peripherals; collaboration tools; mobile device | Service desk, then end-user support |
| Access | Locked account; failed authentication; permissions fault; multi-factor authentication | Service desk, then identity team |
| Security event | Suspected malware; phishing; data exposure; unauthorised access | Security operations |
| Supplier | Failure of a service run by an external supplier | Supplier manager and the named supplier contact |
| Facilities | Power; cooling; building access that affects service | Facilities management |
7.4 Prioritisation
Priority is set from impact and urgency. The analyst sets impact from what the incident affects, and urgency from how soon the business is harmed. The analyst does not set priority from the seniority of the caller; a manager who disagrees uses the escalation route in section 7.9.
| Impact | Meaning |
|---|
| High | A service is down or badly degraded for many users or a customer, a contractual or regulatory commitment is at risk, or data is exposed or lost. |
| Medium | A service is degraded for one team, site or group of customers, or a business function is working with a workaround. |
| Low | One user or one device is affected and a workaround exists or the task can wait. |
| Impact and urgency | High urgency | Medium urgency | Low urgency |
|---|
| High impact | P1 Critical | P2 High | P3 Medium |
| Medium impact | P2 High | P3 Medium | P4 Low |
| Low impact | P3 Medium | P4 Low | P4 Low |
Note. Any incident that matches a major incident criterion is treated as P1 and handled under section 7.10, whatever the matrix gives.
7.5 Response and resolution targets
| Priority | Response | Update interval | Resolution target | Hours of cover |
|---|
| P1 Critical | [15 minutes] | [30 minutes] | [4 hours] | [24 x 7] |
| P2 High | [30 minutes] | [2 hours] | [8 hours] | [24 x 7 for production services, otherwise service hours] |
| P3 Medium | [2 hours] | [1 business day] | [3 business days] | [Service hours] |
| P4 Low | [4 hours] | [2 business days] | [5 business days] | [Service hours] |
The service level agreement for a service may set tighter targets, and those prevail. Response means a named person has taken ownership and contacted the user. When the clock is paused because the incident waits on the user or on a change window, the reason and the resume condition must be written in the record; pausing for any other reason is not permitted.
7.6 Initial diagnosis and first-line resolution
- DiagnoseThe analyst follows the knowledge article for the symptom, or the diagnostic script for the service, and tries to restore service within [20 minutes] for P3 and P4 and [10 minutes] for P1 and P2 before escalating.
- Apply a workaroundWhere service can be restored by a documented workaround, the analyst applies it, records it, and links the incident to the known error if one exists.
- Resolve or pass onIf the analyst cannot restore service in the time allowed, the incident is escalated functionally. The analyst never leaves an incident unassigned or assigned to an individual who is away.
7.7 Investigation and resolution by resolver groups
- Accept ownershipThe resolver group accepts the assignment within the response target for the priority, or returns it with a reason. A rejected incident goes back to the analyst, who reassigns it; it does not wait in a queue.
- Work and recordThe resolver adds each action and finding to the record as it is taken, with time and name, not afterwards. Changes to configuration items are made under the Change Management Procedure; an emergency change is raised where service cannot wait.
- Restore and verifyThe resolver tests that the service works from the user's side, not only from the system side, and records the evidence.
- Record the resolutionThe resolver records what restored service, in words a later reader can follow, selects a resolution code, and links any problem record or change record raised.
7.8 Functional escalation
Functional escalation moves an incident to a team with deeper skill. It happens when first-line diagnosis fails within the time allowed, when the incident needs access the analyst does not have, or when the same symptom appears on a number of configuration items.
| Level | Team | Takes the incident when | Time to accept |
|---|
| First line | Service desk | Every incident is logged and first diagnosed here | [Immediately] |
| Second line | Technical operations, business operations, application support | Diagnosis outside the analyst's knowledge or tools | [Within the response target] |
| Third line | Engineering and development | Defect in code, design or configuration needing a fix | [30 minutes for P1, 2 hours for P2] |
| Supplier | External supplier named in the contract | Service or component is owned by the supplier | [As stated in the contract] |
7.9 Hierarchical escalation
Hierarchical escalation informs managers so that decisions, resources or customer contact can be arranged. It is triggered by time or by impact, and is automatic: nobody needs to ask permission to escalate.
| Trigger | Escalated to | By whom | Within |
|---|
| Resolution target is 75% elapsed and no workaround found | Process manager | Resolver group lead | [Immediately] |
| Resolution target breached on any priority | Service owner | Process manager | [30 minutes] of breach |
| P1 incident open | Service owner and process owner | Service desk analyst | [15 minutes] of logging |
| P1 incident open beyond [2 hours], or a major incident declared | Top management and customer representative | Major incident manager | [As the major incident is declared] |
| Supplier fails to respond to a P1 or P2 incident | Supplier manager, then the supplier's account manager | Process manager | [Within response target plus 30 minutes] |
| User or customer complains about handling | Process manager | Service desk analyst | [1 hour] |
7.10 Major incidents
A major incident is declared when one or more of the following criteria is met. The decision is taken by the process manager or, outside service hours, by the on-call duty manager, and recorded with the time.
- A critical service is unavailable or seriously degraded for [more than 25%] of users or for any customer with a contractual commitment.
- A P1 incident has not been restored within [2 hours], or the cause is not understood.
- There is a confirmed or suspected loss, corruption or exposure of customer data.
- A regulatory, legal or reputational consequence is likely, or the media or a regulator has made contact.
- The service owner or process manager judges that coordinated response is needed.
- DeclareThe process manager declares the major incident, assigns a major incident manager, and opens a dedicated communication channel and a bridge call within [15 minutes].
- MobiliseThe major incident manager calls out the technical lead, the communications lead, a scribe and the resolver groups from the call-out list, and agrees the first update time.
- StabiliseThe team prioritises restoring service over finding the cause. Workarounds, failover and rollback are preferred to new fixes, and any change goes through an emergency change approval.
- InformThe communications lead issues updates every [30 minutes] to the distribution list in section 7.12, covering what is known, what is being done, who is affected and the time of the next update.
- ResolveThe major incident manager declares service restored when the user-facing checks pass, and agrees monitoring for [2 hours] before standing the team down.
- ReviewA post-incident review is held within [5 business days]. It produces a report with timeline, cause as far as known, what worked, what did not and owned actions. A problem record is opened for each unresolved cause.
7.11 Information security incidents
An incident that may be a security event (suspected malware, unauthorised access, data exposure, or loss of a device) is also raised under the Incident Management Procedure and the Information Security Incident Management Policy. The service desk analyst passes the record to security operations within [15 minutes] and does not attempt eradication or deletion of evidence. The CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 require cyber incidents to be reported within 6 hours of noticing, and the Organisation keeps ICT logs for 180 days within Indian jurisdiction [confirm the current requirement]. Security operations decides whether a report is due and who makes it.
7.12 Communication
Users and customers are told what is happening in plain words, at the intervals promised for the priority. Updates are written in the incident record and sent through the channel the user chose.
| Event | Audience | Channel | Timing |
|---|
| Incident logged | Reporter | Same channel as report | [Within 15 minutes] |
| Workaround available | Affected users | Email, portal banner or message board | [As soon as tested] |
| P1 or P2 update | Affected users, service owner, customer representative | Email, status page, bridge call | [Every 30 minutes for P1, every 2 hours for P2] |
| Major incident declared | Top management, customer representatives, all resolver groups | Call-out system, email and bridge call | [Within 15 minutes] |
| Service restored | Affected users and customers | Same channels as the updates | [Within 15 minutes] of verification |
| Post-incident review published | Service owner, customers affected by a major incident | Report by email | [Within 10 business days] |
Wording, status page rules and approvals follow the Communication Procedure. No cause is stated to customers until it is confirmed.
7.13 Resolution, closure and user confirmation
- Propose closureWhen the resolver records the resolution, the incident moves to Resolved and the analyst asks the user to confirm that service is restored.
- Wait for confirmationThe user has [3 business days] to reply. If the user confirms, or does not reply after two reminders, the analyst closes the incident. If the user says service is not restored, the incident is reopened and the clock resumes at the original priority.
- Check the recordBefore closing, the analyst checks that category, configuration item, resolution code, resolution notes, and any linked change, problem or knowledge record are present. The process manager samples [10%] of closed incidents each week.
- Capture knowledgeWhere the incident had no matching knowledge article, the resolver drafts one within [5 business days]. Articles are approved by the resolver group lead.
7.14 Process flow
- Event detected by a user, monitoring tool or supplier.
- Service desk analyst searches for a duplicate, logs the incident and sets category and priority.
- Analyst attempts first-line diagnosis and applies a workaround or fix where one exists.
- If not restored in time, analyst escalates functionally and assigns to the resolver group.
- If a major incident criterion is met, the process manager declares a major incident and the major incident steps apply.
- Resolver group diagnoses, restores service, tests from the user's side and records the resolution.
- Hierarchical escalation is triggered automatically when time or impact thresholds are reached.
- Analyst asks the user to confirm, then closes the record after confirmation or the waiting period.
- Process manager reviews trends monthly; recurring or unexplained incidents are passed to problem management.
8. Interfaces with Other Processes
| Process | Interface |
|---|
| Problem Management Procedure | Incidents that recur, have an unknown cause or follow a major incident are passed to problem management. Known errors and workarounds are supplied to the service desk. |
| Change Management Procedure | Fixes that alter a service are raised as changes, with an emergency route for P1 and P2. Failed changes are logged as incidents. |
| Service Request Management Procedure | A contact that is really a request is re-classified and moved to the request flow. A request that exposes a fault is converted to an incident. |
| Service Level Management Procedure | Targets come from service level agreements. Breaches feed service reports and the review with the customer. |
| Configuration and Asset Management Procedure | Incidents are linked to configuration items so that impact can be read from relationships and so that recurring faults on a component are visible. |
| Availability and Service Continuity Management Procedure | Downtime from incidents is counted for availability reporting. A continuity plan is invoked from a major incident when its criteria are met. |
| Information Security Management for Services | Security events are handed to security operations, with evidence preserved. |
| Supplier Management Procedure | Supplier incidents are managed against contract targets and recorded for supplier performance review. |
| Communication Procedure | Wording, channels and approvals for user and customer messages. |
9. Key Performance Indicators
| Measure | Target | Source | Frequency |
|---|
| Incidents resolved within the resolution target (by priority) | [95% for P1 and P2, 90% for P3 and P4] | [Ticketing tool] report | [Monthly] |
| Incidents responded to within the response target | [98%] | [Ticketing tool] report | [Monthly] |
| First-contact resolution rate | [At least 60%] | [Ticketing tool] report | [Monthly] |
| Incidents reopened within 7 days | [Below 5%] | [Ticketing tool] report | [Monthly] |
| Incidents with correct category and complete mandatory fields at closure | [98%] | Weekly record sample | [Weekly] |
| Hierarchical escalations triggered by missed targets | [Falling quarter on quarter] | Escalation log | [Monthly] |
| Major incidents with a review completed within 5 business days | [100%] | Major incident register | [Per event] |
| User satisfaction with incident handling | [At least 4.2 out of 5] | Closure survey | [Monthly] |
| Backlog of open incidents older than twice their resolution target | [Zero for P1 and P2, below 3% overall] | [Ticketing tool] report | [Weekly] |
10. Records and Evidence
| Record | Kept in | Retention |
|---|
| Incident records, with timeline and resolution | [The ticketing tool] | [3 years] |
| Major incident reports and review actions | [Document management system] | [5 years] |
| Call recordings and chat transcripts | [Contact system] | [12 months] |
| Escalation log and hierarchical escalation notices | [The ticketing tool] | [3 years] |
| Monthly incident review minutes and trend reports | [Document management system] | [3 years] |
| Knowledge articles created from incidents | [Knowledge base] | [Until superseded, then 1 year] |
| Weekly closed-record samples and findings | [Quality folder] | [2 years] |
Annexure A: Incident record
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Incident number | [Generated by the ticketing tool] |
| Date and time logged | |
| Reported by and contact details | |
| Contact route (telephone, portal, email, chat, monitoring, supplier) | |
| Service affected | |
| Configuration item | |
| Symptom described by the user | |
| Time the incident began | |
| Business effect and number of users affected | |
| Category and sub-category | |
| Impact, urgency and priority | |
| Major incident declared (yes or no, time, manager) | |
| Assigned group and person | |
| Clock paused (reason and resume condition) | |
| Actions taken (time, name, action) | |
| Workaround applied | |
| Resolution and resolution code | |
| Linked problem, change or knowledge record | |
| User confirmation (name, date) | |
| Closed by and date | |
Annexure B: Major incident report
| Section | Content |
|---|
| Incident number and title | |
| Declared, restored and closed (times) | |
| Services, customers and users affected | |
| Timeline of key events and decisions | |
| Cause, as far as known, and evidence | |
| Actions that restored service | |
| What worked well and what did not | |
| Communication sent (times and audiences) | |
| Follow-up actions (owner, due date, problem or change reference) | |
| Reviewed and approved by service owner (name, date) | |
Annexure C: Incident escalation log
| Incident number | Priority | Escalation type | Escalated to | Date and time | Reason | Outcome |
|---|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Annexure: Document history
| Version | Date | Author | Summary of change | Approved by |
|---|
| 1.0 | [dd-mm-yyyy] | [Author] | Initial issue from the SecureXcel template | [Approver] |
| | | | |
| | | | |
11. Exception
Exceptions to this document are allowed only where compliance is not practicable and the risk has been assessed. A request must state what is to be excepted, why, the risk it creates, the compensating controls, and an end date no later than [6 months]. It is approved in writing by the document owner and the risk owner, recorded in the exceptions register, and reviewed at the end date. An exception does not change the document.
12. Enforcement
Compliance is monitored through internal audits, management review and routine checks by the document owner. Non-compliance is reported through the incident or non-conformity process and handled under the organisation's disciplinary procedure, and under the terms of any contract for people who are not employees. Serious or repeated non-compliance may lead to loss of access and, where the law is broken, to referral to the authorities.
13. Review
This document is reviewed at least every [12 months], and when there is a significant change to the organisation, its systems, its risks or the law, or after an incident that shows it was not effective. Each review is recorded in the revision history.
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 references
| Reference | Title |
|---|
| 8.6.1 | Incident management |
| 8.6.3 | Problem management |
| 8.1 | Operational planning and control |
| 7.4 | Communication |
| 9.4 | Service reporting |